Archive

Monthly Archives: August 2013

how I was converted to the cult of Daughn Gibson, lost my car along the way, and regained faith in great American songwriting

daughngibson

“My daddy was a beast
He seemed to know well
When you bare that leash
You leave your teeth in trail
We could never keep to sleep
with secrets dying to tell
He laid a kiss in my little hand
and blew that fucker off to hell”
-first verse to “The Sound of Law”

It feels as though you are driving down an unlit, deserted highway at the darkest hour of nighttime. At some point (you can’t recall exactly when) you realize you have no idea where you are; the vast American landscape surrounding you, occasionally dotted with the eerie glow of 24/7 truck stops, looks both vaguely familiar and totally alien. The sky is mostly starless, the headlights flash upon mile markers and increasingly rare exit signs. You glance at your gauges: the emergency gas indicator lights up with a “ding.” As you contemplate holding out for the next gas station in lieu of turning around and burning fumes in the direction of the last one to pass you by, a song comes on the radio. Like the road, it is vaguely familiar and totally alien.

This is how I imagine the music of Daughn Gibson mysteriously coming into being. It probably has something to do with the fact that I was listening to his latest album, Me Moan, when my Dodge Intrepid overheated on the interstate last month; his other-worldly drawl was still permeating from the car speakers as I pulled off to the side of the road and bailed—just in time to watch it burst into flames. Not tiny flames, either: big Hollywood movie flames. Though by this point the music had stopped playing (I was running it through an iPhone connected to the car’s tapedeck, which I hurriedly disconnected before my timely escape), the voice was still ringing in and between my ears as I stood back, maybe thirty feet away from the billowing fire. I reckon I will forever associate this album with some form of the American highway, either in my memory or in my imagination. At the end of the day, the line separating the two is a pretty fine one.

In a way, I feel as though not enough time has elapsed for me to begin writing about an album that, so far, is the clear standout for my favorite record of 2013 (which is saying something, considering the renowned company it shares, including the magnificent returns of Nick Cave & the Bad Seeds and David Bowie—with Push the Sky Away and The Next Day, respectively—along with My Bloody Valentine’s long-awaited third studio album; also, the continued output of newer acts, including the AM gold of Iron & Wine’s Ghost on Ghost and the twisted synth-pop of John Grant’s Pale Green Ghosts). By the same token, I am dying to capture the unique thrill of Me Moan in my own words, to try and share the revelatory beauty of this discovery with others. So here goes it.

I should probably start at the beginning—the first mention I heard of the name “Daughn Gibson.” My friend Dan sent me a text message on a Friday night informing me that our local record store had gotten in a couple copies of a SubPop “Loser Edition” (first pressing on colored vinyl) of Me Moan; he picked up one for himself, and strongly suggested that my boyfriend and I pick up the other one. For this suggestion, I cannot thank him enough.

As advised, we popped out to the record store and eagerly brought our latest acquisition home. The side of the shrink-wrapping was carefully slit open, the inner sleeve removed, the artwork admired: here began the near-sacred ritual known to vinyl-lovers around the world—the induction of a new LP to one’s own, wholly idiosyncratic collection. Next step: the record is examined for paper residue, aligned and placed on the slipmat; the sight of the spindle sliding through the center hole is replete with sexual suggestiveness. Then that most thrilling of moments—that instant the needle hits the outer groove of the spinning record, and music is mysteriously aroused from tiny holes within. For me, this moment would be captivating regardless of the circumstance, even if the record in question was Jane Fonda’s Work-out Album. The excitement is multiplied tenfold when the first song is something as remarkable as “The Sound of Law.”

Two minutes and 55 seconds of sheer exhilaration, the album opener to Me Moan is one of the most promising first tracks of any album I have heard in my lifetime. But unlike a number of records that come to mind, Gibson’s actually delivers on the promise of its initial rush. Second track: a wavy synthesized melody paves the way for the click of a sparse drum machine loop which can only be described as “sublime.” Naysayers can label Gibson’s music with every lofty term of disapproval at their disposal, but “over-produced” is definitely not one of them. It could be said that “The Sound of Law” gripped me by the balls, and “Phantom Rider” was akin to the kiss of death in a dime-novel—the point of no return, if you will.

The thrill of the album never lets up or dissipates at any point on either side. Each song is its own richly detailed kaleidoscope, casting different colors on the mind’s eye and shading them in shifting amounts of light and darkness. The album artwork is a unique evocation of the content within: two blurry, naked figures in a tacky church sanctuary, seemingly in the midst of some violent brand of spiritual awakening—the speaking-in-tongues, snake-handling variety. Although Gibson has admitted a probing interest in the cult of religion, and it does come across quite vividly in his point of view, it is worth noting that none of the songs carry any overt religious reference (unlike his preceding album, All Hell, which features a number of audio samples recognizable as religious recordings—though the sometimes dense layers of sampling in Me Moan could very well comprise such samples, as well). If forced to conjure another visual metaphor, I would illustrate Me Moan as an almost-indistinguishable religious relic found in a dark alleyway, dripping with jizz, blood, and holy water. Sonically, it feels like an ethereal hybrid of the Eno/Byrne collaboration, My Life in the Bush of Ghosts, and the Magnetic Fields’ Charm of the Highway Strip. But here I am attempting to attach recognizable labels to something which can only be defined as a totally distinctive, entirely inimitable new voice in American music.

I have read every interview with Daughn Gibson (né Josh Martin) that I’ve been able to get my hands on, and the one adjective that appears to pop up from interviewers more than any other is “Lynchian”—that is, reminiscent of the films of David Lynch. I must confess, this analogy struck me almost immediately while listening to Me Moan for the first time; but I think it is necessary to clarify for the un-initiated that Gibson’s music is anything but derivative. I think what we are responding to when driven to employ the “L-word” is the stream-of-consciousness effect of the lyrics and melodies, along with the effortless (though no doubt carefully orchestrated) ebb and flow of the songs. A number of current bands/recording artists have taken a deliberately cinematic approach to their songwriting in recent years, including Garbage, St. Vincent, and The Horrors; but Gibson has less in common with these recordings than he does with, say, the short stories of Flannery O’Connor and Ray Carver, the novels of Cormac MacCarthy and Carson McCullers, or the plays of Tennessee Williams. Whereas albums inspired by films tend to have an exterior effect (with Jim O’Rourke’s Nicolas Roeg-derived quartet as a notable exception), Me Moan feels more like an internal exploration. It doesn’t simply tell stories: it takes us deep inside the stories, allowing us to get lost on the way, finding ourselves again in increasingly unexpected—and increasingly disquieting—territory. But this is just one of many ways in which Gibson’s work could easily be distinguished from other recordings produced today.

In an era marked by social media and devolution—where outlaws are characterized by the willful ignorance, blatant misogyny, and oblivious materialism of many a redneck/gangster song—the time is long overdue for a cleverly crafted incarnation of the American lowlife; the kind that populated Elmore Leonard novels, John Huston movies, and Lou Reed’s Berlin, not to mention our country’s very own slums and back-roads. Nick Cave accomplished this in the nineties with Murder Ballads, especially in the brilliantly profane “Stagger Lee,” but I am loath to think of any American songwriter who successfully took this burden on himself (Eminem is credited with this achievement in the minds of many critics; though I might concede some inspired moments, his output generally seems to lack focus, let alone any kind of moral intelligence). In at least three songs on Me Moan (“The Sound of Law,” “Phantom Rider,” and “Pisgee Nest”), Daughn Gibson pulls the feat off with daring aplomb. In all eleven songs, his intensely suggestive prose constantly captures the lives and thoughts of characters on the fringes of existence, such as the mother of an unwanted child in “You Don’t Fade,” the misanthrope smoking a broken cigarette in “All My Days Off,” and the “man on the other side of luck” narrating the album closer, “Into the Sea.”

If Daughn Gibson’s songwriting is rooted firmly in earthy subject matter, it is also a model representation of that rarest strain of songwriting—the kind that celebrates the individuality of the performer, enabling the listener to bathe in the singular experience of the songs (there are many other performers working along these lines today, but few are as fully-formed and confident in their approach as Mr. Gibson). Discovering songwriters in this vein has always been a cherished and revelatory event for me; whether it is David Byrne or David Bowie, Siouxsie Sioux or Suzanne Vega, I practically live for the experience of music that transports me to a separate world devised by the artist. It is not escapism, per se—it is more about finding “relief from the itch of being,” as Nabokov once phrased it. What is more, these songs often come much closer to achieving some form of shared transcendence than those with an open agenda of social commentary, in that they enable listeners to examine themselves and others in a new light, without ever feeling like a puppet whose strings are being tugged at.

I am providing this background for my opinion because it is the only way I can conceive of contextualizing, without putting the record on for you to experience firsthand, the sheer freshness of this music. It rushes over and all throughout your body before you even have a chance to compartmentalize it—after all, it is hard to intellectualize something you can’t stop swaying your hips to. Suffice it to say, the songs on Me Moan are violent, horny, lurid, and sometimes tragic; they are also extremely smart and totally inspired. So at the risk of getting analytical, I would like to momentarily examine Gibson’s songs in the light of their stylistic innovation.

An admitted fan of country music, listing some contemporary songs (Kenny Chesney’s “A Lot of Things Different,” for one) alongside the classics (Hank Williams, Johnny Cash, Waylon Jennings), Daughn Gibson has elucidated in interviews his fondness for folk songwriting—writing about the little things you know, as opposed to the big things beyond your control. Indeed, the songs on Me Moan are, in essence, folk songs. They are also dance songs; funeral dirges; mini-operas. Equal parts disco and Dostoyevsky. He doesn’t appear to be reinventing the proverbial wheel, so much as disregarding its very existence. As stated before, there is a literary link to his songwriting, but it is not an adaptive one; the stories are either inspired directly from his own imagination, or drawn from local history (the haunting “Pisgee Nest” is about a reported “gang-bang” near his home town; “Franco” is about a child who committed suicide). They can be chilling and weirdly humorous, sometimes in the same breath. As far as I am concerned, this clarity of vision, alongside the idiosyncrasy of his language (his lyrics are peerless), places him in the pantheon of the great American writers he references when interviewed.

Speaking of disco, there is another musical thread running to Duaghn Gibson in my mind, but it is very possible (and more than likely) that it is not a conscious association on his behalf whatsoever. I am speaking of the obscure and short-lived country-disco genre, briefly popularized by the likes of Sylvia (check out “Drifter”) and Saskia & Serge (“Country Disco Train”); several established country acts dabbled in this territory as well, including Dolly Parton (the Heartbreaker album) and Terri Gibbs (“Somebody’s Knockin’”). It is an acquired taste, to say the least, but one that I have not been able to resist cultivating over the years. Whereas true country music is often delivered earnestly, sometimes severely, country-disco toyed more with the Opryland approach—heightening the showmanship and theatricality to a near-parodic extent. Gibson’s “Kissin’ On the Blacktop” could be said to achieve similar proportions, straddling the line between sincerity and kitsch; even the music video plays up this bemused detachment, with Daughn lip syncing in a dive bar with a sly grin on his face. In less capable hands, a song like this could tilt the balance of the album’s narrative in the direction of aimless superficiality. As conducted by Gibson, it actually enhances the album by providing an added dynamic, an extra dash of wry humor. It’s a damned catchy tune, to boot.

Another, more plausible thread could be drawn to songs by the late, great Warren Zevon—“Play It All Night Long,” in particular (maybe that’s where the jizz and blood analogy originated, come to think of it). Once again, though, I must make it perfectly clear for the reader that nothing on Me Moan appears obviously derivative. It does not harken back to an older form of songwriting; it is entirely current, and seemingly timeless. It could be said he picks up where Depeche Mode left off with “Personal Jesus” in 1989. Consider it country music for fans of the real deal, eager to hear it carried over into the 21st century, disenchanted by what has been passing under the misappropriated moniker for too long now: one might even call it an antidote to the hopelessly dumb antics of Kid Rock and Toby Keith (or: country music for people who like to party, but also read books).

Much has already been written about Daughn Gibson’s voice, so I won’t linger on it too long myself—though I might be inclined to do so under different circumstances. The one thing I find most remarkable about his voice is the ability to take a single word and out of it form a tiny universe. Take “The Right Signs,” for instance (a stand-out track, in my mind): it is composed of nine simple lines, yet it conjures a whole multitude of moods and details. It is in the way he draws out the last vowel in the phrase, “It’s a mystery to me,” before completing it with “why I fell for you;” and then repeats the trick with “My favorite dream/is loving someone new.” Each vocal delivery is as ingenious and textured as the next; collectively, they run the gamut from total reinvention of the English language to near-comical exaggeration. They also frequently evoke words and images that aren’t anywhere close to the lyric itself: when I finally sat down with the lyric sheet and read it as a whole, I realized that at least half of the songs had already borne an entirely different life in my head. By combining the real thing with the imagined interpretation (once again, a fine line to cross), the songs somehow become even richer.

Let me give you a specific example: in the elegiac “Franco,” the final lines of the chorus are, “I wish we had a kid/who never wanted to die.” The first dozen or so times I listened to the record, I interpreted it as, “I wish we had a kid/and never wanted to die”—which I took as a declaration of desire for a family obligation to remove (what I perceived to be) the narrator’s existential quandary. When I realized it was being told from the parents of a child who took his own life, it dawned on me that Gibson is operating in rather delicate territory, where the alteration of a single word can yield two entirely different—and equally affecting—emotional impacts. His command of this territory is masterful.

At the moment, my favorite songs on Me Moan are probably “Mad Ocean” and “Won’t You Climb” (though I am very partial to “Franco,” “Phantom Rider,” “The Right Signs”… hell, they’re all so terrific), a pair of fever dreams that fuse fragmented imagery with imaginative instrumentation and an oddly moving poeticism. They are, quite simply, unlike anything I have heard before, and they’ve provided an unexpectedly original soundtrack to the summer of 2013; I just cannot stop myself from listening to them over and over, with an excitement that recalls my days as a teenager obsessed with punk rock and eighties alternative. This must be what Christian zealots refer to when they talk about being “born again.”

An eagerly awaited package arrived in the mail yesterday: its contents—Gibson’s debut LP, All Hell. I zealously placed it on the turntable and dropped the needle; as expected, it is every bit as satisfying as the follow-up LP. Some of the songs I had already heard in video clips on YouTube and elsewhere, but hearing them together as a cohesive set was no less exciting an experience than listening to Me Moan for the first time. This guy is so good at what he does, I cannot help but be humbled when listening to his work—perpetually grateful for the strangely beautiful world he transports me to, the perverse joy of his peculiar language. Here is an artist whose work exceeds my wildest dreams, and gives concrete life to thoughts and emotions I’ve always had and never quite been able to define on my own.

Thinking back to my burning car on the side of the interstate, I can’t help but recall the circumstances behind the unfortunate episode: I was bound for Indianapolis to catch Low and Swans in concert, an event I was grossly disappointed to have missed out on (though relieved to have survived the accident in one piece). I later learned that Daughn Gibson played a show in Columbus that very night—about an hour’s drive from my hometown; since his website erroneously listed him as being in Detroit, reviews of the Columbus show indicated a small turnout. Low and Swans would surely have been a legendary live experience, but I would give anything to have been in Columbus that night. As it is, I cannot wait for Gibson to come around these parts again: I can already foresee myself going into an ecstatic state of near-religious fervor, not unlike the one depicted on the cover of Me Moan, as I hear and see these songs—now permanently imprinted in my brain and on my tongue—brought to gloriously unnatural life before my eyes and ears. I might close my eyes on occasion and see the dotted lines along that dark, lonely highway; the ever-burning glow of those all-night truck stops; the empty American landscape stretching for miles all around me. I will be dancing my ass off the whole time.

Related videos:

“All Hell,” a short film by Saam Farahmand

“Daughn Gibson/Dazed & Confused Draft” directed by John Clayton Lee

“Kissin’ on the Blacktop” music video, directed by Jeremiah Rouse

An appreciation of Bertolucci’s Me and You

© 2012 Fiction Films

© 2012 Fiction Films

The films of Bernardo Bertolucci have held, and will always hold, a very special place in my heart. I will never forget seeing Last Tango in Paris for the first time at the age of 17—being enthralled from that opening shot of Brando covering his ears to block the sound of a passing el train, looking up to the sky and screaming, “fucking God!” No two words could have more precisely summed up my teenage angst at the time. And the irony of this, of course, is that Brando’s character was at the opposite end of the age spectrum; a man in his later years, wise with the experience of adulthood, looking slovenly and rather childish as he reveals his unrelenting inner anguish to the camera. I suppose some feelings never leave us altogether, no matter how much we grow up—or how hard we fight against growing up.

If there is a running theme throughout Bertolucci’s work, I would identify it as a study in the distance between individuals, as well as the roles said individuals play in an attempt to bridge this distance. Let us take a brief overview of his early films with this in mind: in his debut, La Commare Secca (The Grim Reaper), a series of killings is being investigated, and the story is told through interviews with potential suspects and witnesses. The role of the serial killer is portrayed here as an attempt to connect oneself permanently to another human being–to shorten the distance between one’s own sociopathy and another’s general apathy. Likewise, the role of the investigator is a quintessential metaphor for bringing a close to the distance between criminal and victim. Later, in La Conformista (The Conformist), the attempt to bridge this distance between persons is carried to the extreme of fascism: in order to obliterate the perceived social harm of his homosexual inclinations, Jean-Louis Trintignant becomes a willing collaborator with Mussolini’s regime, and in the process eliminates every trace of his own identity. Thus, fascism is revealed to be an ineffective mode of social transcendence–something which should be rather obvious to all concerned by now, yet the message comes across more eerily relevant today in the light of consumer fascism and an unprecedented degree of social conformism.

Then there is Last Tango in Paris, in which Brando and Maria Schneider lock themselves up in a barely-furnished Parisian apartment to escape the noise of the outside world and attempt a sort of mystical communion between themselves as human beings. If there is such a thing as the quintessential Bertolucci picture (something I would personally shy away from declaring, considering the priceless relevance of numerous films across his career), it would be this: the focus in Last Tango is so tightly concentrated on these two characters that we, as voyeurs, become fully absorbed in their intimate struggle. There is nowhere to hide from them, no “greater cause” (such as the fascism of The Conformist or the communism of Novecento) to abandon oneself to in resignation of a personal search for equilibrium. Stripped away of all social consciousness, family obligations, and individual dignity (not to mention clothing), the aforementioned theme of bridging the distance between two people is never spelled out more clearly than in Last Tango. In fact, the most beautiful image in the film arises directly from this very concept: sprawled out on the hardwood floor, legs nakedly intertwined, Brando and Schneider attempt to achieve mutual orgasm without any direct stimulation—simply by willing it to happen. It is an image simultaneously beautiful, political, sensual, rebellious, poetic, and philosophic; it is the very essence of Bertolucci’s cinema.

Following Last Tango in Paris, Bertolucci embarked on a couple of grandiose projects with arguably mixed results, but to this viewer they are both dazzling evocations of man’s attempts to come to terms with his fellow man (and, in turn, with himself). Shrugged off at the time of its original release as the self-indulgent product of a bloated ego, Novecento is only now starting to be appreciated for the timeless, masterful giant of a film that it truly is; on the other hand, The Last Emperor was greeted with widespread praise during its initial release, but today can be appreciated most faithfully as a rather nostalgic representation of a past world (funny how history always finds a way to reframe the present). And one cannot give an overview of Bertolucci’s oeuvre without making mention of La Luna (The Moon), one of his lesser-seen films from the glorious heyday of seventies filmmaking; La Luna remains a curiosity above anything else, but it is a surprisingly effective and oddly rewarding curiosity. In a way, it is the most extreme of his pursuits for an understanding of man’s place in the world, exploring a child’s possible role in relation to his mother as either dependent, independent, counter-dependent, or even sexually motivated. The still-shocking scene of Jill Clayburgh masturbating her son can even be viewed as an extension of the attempted mutual orgasm in Last Tango: a last-ditch effort to connect with someone who is in the process of drifting further away. Taken as a whole, all of the above-mentioned titles form a thoroughly cohesive and fully-formed body of work. Bertolucci certainly ranks alongside the finest filmmakers of his generation (Altman, Godard, Pasolini, Fassbinder) as fulfillment of the auteur theory, and validation of the art of film as an art of action painting.

There are in fact few filmmakers whose continued output I look forward to as avidly as Bertolucci’s, which only served to exacerbate my profound disappointment last year when his latest release, Io e Te (Me and You), failed to find US distribution. I will save my diatribe about the irritating ignorance of American film distributors, as well as the all-too-complacent attitude of the average American movie-goer, for another time; what I want to get across more than anything else in this piece is that everyone should be hunting down a copy of Me and You—now available as a Region 2 DVD release—and discovering for him/herself one of the finest films of 2012 that hardly anyone got to see.

In his previous film, The Dreamers (a vastly underrated retelling of the political upheaval in Paris during the summer of 1968), Bertolucci created a microcosm of the drug-laced, cinema-driven philosophy of the 60’s, placing it in the context of a legendary student-led revolution; curiously, his take on this oft-poeticized period in film history is not entirely romantic, and quite firmly grounded in a realistic understanding of where the students went wrong. Not to say it is without nostalgic flourishes—such as the sequence in which the protagonists recreate a running-through-the-Louvre routine from Godard’s Bande à Part—but overall, The Dreamers is told from the perspective of someone who has since woken up from his reverie. Me and You ought to be seen in the context of this maturity, as far as I am concerned. Because from this perspective, it forms the perfectly symmetrical counterpoint to that earlier triumph, Last Tango in Paris—filmed forty years prior when Bertolucci was 31. In Me and You, at the age of 71, the director revisits the familiar premise (two people hiding from the outside world in a barely-furnished apartment) but creates a curious, age-reversal paradox: whereas in the earlier of the two films he projected his existential crisis into the concerns of an older man, the protagonist of his more recent effort is a high school-aged introvert. I cannot imagine a more suitable analogy for growth-related restlessness—the anxiety that arises from feeling one is perpetually living outside of one’s ideal self.

Adapted from a novel by Niccolò Ammaniti (author of the 2003 international success, I’m Not Scared), Me and You is the story of Lorenzo, a somewhat narcissistic boy who shuns a high school ski trip in favor of spending a week alone in the basement of his apartment complex. His solipsistic plans are thwarted, however, when his half-sister, Olivia, shows up to collect a box of her belongings. Following his initial repulsion at unexpected company, Lorenzo soon realizes that Olivia is a recovering heroin addict, and is in dire need of a place to hide out and detoxify. As their respective personal problems boil beneath the surface in each other’s company, we—the audience—are granted a unique opportunity to examine a number of pertinent issues linked to contemporary society, without ever having anything spelled out or neatly resolved for us.

Lorenzo and Olivia are both presented as products of free-market capitalism, each orientated on a different notch of the socioeconomic spectrum. Whereas Lorenzo has been blindly blessed with every modern commodity imaginable from a young age (including his choice of snowboard brand), Olivia is living the life of a model and an artist—struggling to make ends meet and having to work at relationships with others to form a network of assistance. Lorenzo’s greatest luxury is that of not requiring the company of anyone else for personal fulfillment; he is materially set up by his family resources, and intellectually satisfied with his own speculative capacities. This disparity is at the core of the relationship between the two characters, but it is never stated plainly by Bertolucci, a creative choice which cannot be interpreted as anything but restraint (bear in mind the explicit politics of most every film he has made, The Dreamers included). In spite of its 93-minute running time, Me and You actually feels like his most open film; the story has ample space to breathe, to be felt and interpreted in equal measures.

Something that occurred to me halfway through the first viewing was the potential extent to which each character would be likely to assimilate within a capitalistic society. Lorenzo, a somewhat misanthropic recluse who could conceivably become a sociopath under the right circumstances, is the more likely of the two to succeed in a capitalist environment; his anti-social patterns of behavior actually lend themselves to the necessary emotional detachment of a corporate CEO. On the other hand, Olivia, the more sociable of the two half-siblings, is bound to face many difficulties in making ends meet as an artist, let alone were she to attempt climbing a corporate latter. And yet she is the one whose ideology most accurately represents the complexity of the real world. Towards the end of the picture, she reveals her involvement in an art project titled “I Am a Wall,” grounded in the principle that if everyone were stripped of his or her individual point of view, there would be no inequality. She then points out the necessary fault of this philosophy a few sentences later by explaining how drug addiction is bad because it makes one indifferent—or without a point of view. This is what many “free thinkers” attempted to achieve through prolific drug use in the 1960’s: a society wherein everyone could be equally indifferent, and therefore equally at peace. Olivia’s heroin addiction is a touching representation of an individual suffering as a consequence of her attempt to work out a socioeconomic conundrum, while her youthfully oblivious half-brother is practically primed for success by never having to spare a thought on the outside world. Bertolucci has clearly tired of offering concrete solutions to these problems in the form of party politics, but he has not renounced the principles on which these politics were built. He is instead trying to find new ways of framing the age-old questions, exploring different avenues to communicate his own ideological wisdom.

I find it impressive how aptly Bertolucci has managed to incorporate the presence of modern technology and social media—smart phones, texting, laptops, iTunes—throughout the narrative of Me and You, a synthesis he has not attempted in any of his other films. He understands these phenomena as inevitable products at the disposal of today’s youth, rather than wagging his finger in curmudgeonly disapproval of their pathologically damaging characteristics. This makes him a septuagenarian filmmaker who smartly refuses to lock himself within the dogma of his own youth, an old man who knows all too well that the real problems faced by modern-day teenagers are the same problems he was confronted with at their age (chiefly, the struggle to comprehend and approach the distance between individuals).

One of the first things that struck me upon viewing Me and You was the choice of the Cure’s “Boys Don’t Cry” to underline the opening sequence. It struck me because it is a really great pop song, even after thirty-plus years of being overplayed; it also struck me because it is a rather fitting poem to accompany Bertolucci’s unique sensibility as a male filmmaker. Because even though boys in his films seldom cry, they are often seen “hiding the tears in [their] eyes;” and when they are allowed to openly vent their emotions, as in the unforgettable monologue Brando delivers to his wife’s corpse in Last Tango, it is done with an almost embarrassingly fluid sincerity. This kind of earnestness is stereotypically tied to homosexuality, or the arcane notion of inherent weakness in male homosexuals (Ingmar Bergman went so far as to insist that Last Tango in Paris can only be understood when viewed as the story of a repressed homosexual, to which Bertolucci simply replied, “I accept all interpretations of my films”). If anything, I think Bertolucci deserves credit for being one of the most understanding and thoughtful interpreters of male sexuality on screen.

Indeed, for being an overt heterosexual, Bertolucci’s movies display a dense array of homoerotic undertones. This may be tied to his close friendship with Pasolini, whom he was acquainted with from a young age (his own father, Attilio Bertolucci, was a poet who frequently had Pasolini over to their house to visit). Whatever the source, Bertolucci’s understanding of man’s complex sexual psychology, combined with his daring willingness to depict every related taboo—including a child’s discovery of masturbation in Novecento, a man’s sodomitic lust in Last Tango, and the intimation of incest in La Luna—must be acknowledged as groundbreaking artistic gestures in the medium. In Me and You, there is no explicit sexuality, but there remains a visual appreciation for physical beauty, both male and female (along with a reasonable allowance for emotive display), that puts the shallow eroticism of present-day Hollywood movie-making to shame. Bertolucci almost imperceptibly captures the quiet, sexual potential of Lorenzo lounging in his underwear, the statuesque radiance of Olivia strutting in an oversized fur coat, the abstract sensuousness of her suggestive photography. He allows the sexual tension between the two half-siblings to develop and exist as a biological fact, but never stoops to exploiting it as a means to sell tickets (which he was accused of, and partly admitted to endeavoring in La Luna).

There is another use of pop music in Me and You that merits mention, and that is the use of David Bowie’s “Space Oddity” in two different forms—the original English-language recording, as well as the obscure Italian rendition, “Ragazzo Solo, Ragazza Sola” (“Lonely Boy, Lonely Girl”). Bertolucci has always used pop music tastefully in his films; the most deliberately stylized selections to date would have to be the ones featured in Stealing Beauty, although The Dreamers was similarly replete with carefully arranged music cues. Bowie has not featured into any of his other soundtracks, and his inclusion here appears both perfectly timed and seamlessly integral. After all, what better example is there in pop history of an artist whose entire premise is based upon connecting the dots between seemingly separate entities? Who else invested as much creative effort in blurring the lines between man and woman, singer and actor, author and interpreter? Not unlike Bertolucci’s running concern with the distance between individuals, Bowie the artist has been predominantly working in the spaces between popular conventions—the gray areas dividing music genres, and the resulting pastiche of conflicting perspectives. The song itself, “Space Oddity,” is an incredibly produced five minutes of rock’n’roll ecstasy, but it is also, lyrically, a conversation between two people at extreme distances from one another. In the Italian interpretation (the lyric was given a complete facelift by the Italian translator/songwriter Mogol, whose other credits include conversions of songs by Mamas & the Papas, Bob Dylan, and Procol Harum), the conversation is shifted from the parameters of a control base and an astronaut, to a boy wandering the streets at night and the girl he runs into. So we have the distance between the characters in Mogol’s translation, juxtaposed against the distance between Lorenzo and Olivia, framed by the immense distance of outer space.

The very title, Me and You, suggests a plethora of dualisms: there is, of course, the “me” and “you” of the two protagonists (in itself two separate dualities); then there is the dichotomy between the director and the actors; the dichotomy between the writer and the audience; the relationship between the writer and the director; one could go on for an eternity breaking down every division that arises as a necessary byproduct of this, or any film. What matters is not so much the geometry of this formula, but the simplicity of the suggestion. Bertolucci has filmed some of the most eloquently alluring images in celluloid history, and after decades of articulate intellectualization and delicate film poetry, he has resolved to tell a simple story in simple terms. As a result, the complexity of his viewpoint has never been so lucid and palpable.

In the midst of this clarity, one might notice that Me and You is riddled with tiny allusions to other Bertolucci films (though I cannot be certain how much of this is intentional and how much is serendipitous). During a dinner conversation with his mother, Lorenzo broaches a number of rhetorical questions dealing with mother-son incest (calling to mind Matthew Barry in La Luna); in another scene, Lorenzo pockets a semi-nude photograph of his half-sister, not unlike Michael Pitt’s confiscation of a nude snapshot of Eva Green in The Dreamers; and the very nature of the relationship between Lorenzo and Olivia most clearly echoes the socioeconomic gap between Gerard Depardieu and Robert De Niro in Novecento. If these are all intentional references, I still cannot decide whether they are meant to be an inventory of sorts (like Godard’s amalgamation of his own previous films in Pierrot Le Fou) or simply a thread of continuity to indicate the ongoing relevance of Bertolucci’s prior interests.

Over the past forty-odd years, Bertolucci has taken us through a century’s-worth of Italian history, a detailed recreation of fascism during the Second World War, and a lavish depiction of the transition between Imperial China and the PRC; in the nineties, he reined things in more tightly, as seen in his exploration of a young woman’s family history (Stealing Beauty), his reimagining of the myth of Buddha (Little Buddha), and the delicate love triangle of Besieged. In Me and You, he condensed his perspective to an unprecedented extent, and has delivered a film that both complements and enriches an already prosperous resumé. When I see recent interviews with Bertolucci, now wheel-chair bound and revealing an air of graceful frailty, I cannot help but feel a sense of dread at the emptiness that will result the day he departs from this world; I comfort myself in the knowledge that he is going to leave behind a priceless gallery of moving art—and it will never cease to provoke thought and inspire awe.